Evolution Vs. Creation Essays - Evolutionary Biology, Genetics

Evolution vs. Creation Evolution versus Creationism is a hot topic that is in constant debate among scientists and Christians. Held in high regard to the world of science, Evolution, is the theory that groups of organisms change with passage of time, mainly as a result of natural selection, so that descendants differ morphologically and physiologically from their ancestors. On the other hand, faith of millions of Christians hold the truth that, the act of GOD by which the whole entire world was brought into existence is where the basis of everything in existence today came from. In regards to the two arguments above, my entire ballot is supporting the views and ideas of the Creation theory. Evolution is a theory that is based on science and concrete evidence. Faith is in no way, shape, or form, a factor that influences the ideas and theories supported by Scientists. Faithless and blind, the world of science chooses to support a claim that is shattered by the faith of millions and millions of Christians. In my argument, there are several ideas that I have researched on the internet as to why evolution is an invalid theory, and is to be disregarded as the basis for such a fine genre of study, such a science. Evolution is a process that cannot take place unless mutations that are random occur. In the instance of animal's advanced mechanisms of defense, random mutation could not produce them. A specific beetle dubbed the "bombardier beetle" possesses two chemical tanks in its body. Upon attacking the beetle, two different chemicals in the tanks are sprayed from the body. Combined in the air, a hot explosion is produced in the face of the predator. In light of evolution, when the initial mutations occurred and the tanks were just starting to form but were not yet able to function properly, they would serve no purpose to the beetle. Thousands of mutations, and millions of years would be need to produce the end result of the beetles defense, especially since the mechanism would not aide the animal in any survival advantage until it was fully developed. Plus, mutations are random and they never would be able to follow a pattern that would exhibit the end result of the beetle's defense mechanis m. Evolution simply does not work. Evolution would be comparable to copying a computer program over to a computer that would randomly change one byte during each copy process. You could copy the program a billion times but the result would only produce a program that does not function, not a program with added features. Another point to be observed when taking consideration into the theory of evolution is the proposed idea of intermediate fossils. The basic problem is that, there are no intermediate fossils. If evolution were a theory that held truth, there would be numerous examples of animals, which are between the stages of development of different characteristics. For example, there is yet to be a discovery of a fossil that exhibits how wings developed. There is no fossil that objectifies a creature or animal that has a forelimb that is halfway between being an arm, and half way between being a leg. That is one more reason that nullifies the idea of evolution. Another factor that does not support the idea of evolution is the factor of DNA. All observed mutations of DNA cause a loss of DNA information. All experiments in the laboratory that include DNA of mutated specimens always show a loss of DNA information. For evolution to truly take place there must be the addition of new data to the DNA chain, yet there has never been the case to this point. Oddly enough, many supporters of evolution always show animals that have lost some feature, de-evolution, and regard that as an example of evolution? Closing my researched ideas falsifying evolution, it is shown that there are three major aspects alone, not including others, why evolution is not a valid theory of creation. Since mutations are random, they would never be able to follow a set pattern to achieve the end result of a set species. Intermediate fossils that would support the claim of evolving animals do not exist. Plus, DNA of species

Avoiding Stereotypes in Writing

Avoiding Stereotypes in Writing Avoiding Stereotypes in Writing Avoiding Stereotypes in Writing By Catherine Osborn It is easy to fall into the trap of using language that can be construed as racist or sexist. Here are a few tips to stay away from this type of writing. Avoid sexist language. When you know your audience varies, stay away from words that are gender specific. Use â€Å"their† instead of â€Å"his† or â€Å"anyone† instead of â€Å"a man†. You’d be surprised how many people take these sorts of things the wrong way. Avoid ethnic and racial stereotypes. You can be accurate without being biased. For example, it could be considered impolite to say Oriental; you should say Asian or better yet, the specific country such as Japanese, Korean, etc†¦. Be careful not to let religious stereotypes creep into your writing. Such as referring to a banker as Jewish, of course. This is too biased. Biases against age and sexual orientation are also frowned upon. In all these cases, it is best to well, use your best judgment. Avoid political bias and stereotypes in case you want your audienceTo read your content under a neutral point of view. This is especially important in business writing contexts. Research your facts and dont include statements you believe to be true just because the majority of people also believe so. Remember that people in different regions or countries might have a different understanding regarding what is considered sexiest or racist. When in doubt, scratch that. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Business Writing category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Regarding Re:8 Proofreading Tips And TechniquesHow Verbs Become Adjectives

Role Of Manager And Organizational Theory Coursework - 2

Role Of Manager And Organizational Theory - Coursework Example The managers take the role of implementing the gathered information on the problems that the client faces. It is the role of the manager to resolve the issues derived from the gathered information. Therefore, according to the organizational theory, the role of the manager is to solve problems that face the customers(Jones, 2001). In a suitable world, the conflicting role of the theory is never an issue since the role managers think they should play and those that employees think they need to play is always in a sync proportion. Heineken Company poses to be one of the greatest organization in the universe. The management of the company has contributed to the success of the company. The management of the company has set the role of the managers and employees based on the organizational theory. The problems that arise in the company are always analyzed and reacted critically before coming up with a decision. The management uses this technique to reduce the conflict issues in a company. The company understands that avoiding issues or conflicts within the organization may prohibit the manager from playing their management role (Jones, 2001).